Walleye Express Posted December 9, 2009 Posted December 9, 2009 I talked to some important people with the DNR today about this. I'm posting and sending this to everybody I know, including businesses, local Chamber of Commerce, TV stations and/or anybody who will listen. I'd like anybody in position to help in any fashion in this matter to do so. Draft concerning a Lawsuit filed against the Mi. DNR for license to Commercially net walleyes out of Lake Huron/Saginaw Bay. It is my only intention here in writing and sending this draft to you, is to first inform and (if possible) seek a response by all that receive and/or see it. Our DNR is being sued by one commercial fisherman, for the exclusive rights of this one commercial fisherman, to harvest walleyes on Lake Huron. This may very well (and probably will) include Saginaw Bay. The hearing date to hear this law suit by a federal judge is set for February 10th. How he will rule on this matter may very well effect the quality of fishing all of us will have for the coming years. If nothing else, it would surely effect the catch rate and peoples mind-set and willingness to come to our community to spend their leisure dollars in our local businesses. And IMHO if this one man was licensed to net walleyes, other commercial fishermen will surely fallow suit and petition for those same rights. I do not have to mention the huge (Volunteered) public and private efforts, along with the cost and time spent over the last 25 by the state to bring this fishery back to wear it was 70 years ago. And all that time with no walleye netting allowed. This is not a personal Vendetta against commercial fishermen. I only seek to have those who have concerns for this fishery and its future to have a voice in this matter and its possible results. And is my intention at this juncture, along with another concerned fisherman (Bill Olar) to simply make a plea to seek support of businesses, fishing clubs and/or individuals who can and who will get behind an effort to spread this word and to have a voice in it’s conclusion. We could also use any (Pro Bono) legal advise or help in this matter, as we are not (yet) monetarily able at this time to hire a lawyer to join with the DNR attorney as litigants in this case. And in fact may be denied that opportunity by the federal judge. But can (if need be) get in on an appeal that would then be brought by the DNR into the states court jurisdiction. We may also call of have a meeting of concerned citizens to discuss this matter and our alternatives. Thank you for your time and please respond with comments to my E-mail address. Capt. Dan Manyen.
Walleye Express Posted December 9, 2009 Author Posted December 9, 2009 Fallow-up.Michigan sued over walleye rulesAssociated Press DETROIT - One of Michigan's most successful commercial fishermen is suing the state to try to overcome a decades-old ban on catching walleye in the Great Lakes.Dana Serafin of Pinconning is forced to release thousands of walleye from his nets while catching other fish in Lake Huron. In 2008, he proposed a three-year study of the walleye population that included a provision for him to keep and sell some of his haul.No thanks, replied the state Department of Natural Resources "They're the bully in the lake, 2 to 3 feet long - we have pictures," said Serafin's lawyer, Anthony Calamunci. "In Saginaw Bay, there is cannibalization going on. It's killing perch and whitefish at enormous rates. "There's just not enough food."Calamunci filed a lawsuit in April in federal court in Bay City, claiming the state's ban on commercial walleye fishing is a constitutional violation that diminishes the value of Serafin's license.The DNR is asking a judge to dismiss the case."The restrictions on walleye fishing have been in place for at least 35 years, long before Serafin obtained his first commercial license," Assistant Attorney General Louis Reinwasser said in a Nov. 13 court filing.Michigan law gives the DNR "complete discretion to limit the amount of fish taken by species and kind," he wrote.The DNR describes Serafin, 42, as the largest commercial fisherman on Lake Huron, catching 990,000 pounds of whitefish worth approximately $1 million in 2008.His license is "indisputably" valuable, despite the walleye ban, Reinwasser said.A DNR official, James Dexter, suggested that the state does not want to change the policy because that could reduce the walleye population and disappoint recreational anglers. The fish can be found across the Great Lakes region, and Michigan's neighbors have similar restrictions."It is estimated that more than 2 million Michigan residents fish for sport in the state's waters, and thousands more travel from all parts of the world," Dexter, who oversees fishing regulations, said in an affidavit. "The economic impact is estimated to be $2-4 billion annually."Calamunci accuses the DNR of treating walleye like a "sacred species." He said Serafin at a minimum would like to keep some walleye as well as tag others and return them to the lake."And then over a three-year period we could test the impact on other species. There's a science to this," the lawyer said.He noted that Canada allows commercial fishermen to keep walleye caught on its side of Lake Huron and sell them to stores and restaurants.U.S. District Judge Thomas Ludington has scheduled a hearing for Feb. 10.
Rayman96 Posted December 9, 2009 Posted December 9, 2009 This guy single-handidly harvests close to a million pounds of whitefish. :eek: I think he should loose his harvest license to save him from the agony of releasing all those walleye!!!!!!!!!!!! :o
Adam Bomb Posted December 9, 2009 Posted December 9, 2009 Ya, im definitely not for this at all. Once one foot is in they all want in. And with the reservation being in Standish and they now own the marina, i can only imagine them wanting their hand in on the action as well. I say say no to em all!!! Our monies and clubs stocked the fishery to get it where it is. Only in the recent past has nature finally took the reigns again and is self sustaining. Last i heard, we're still not to our holding capacity, and we've been waiting a long time for this to come back around. So leave it alone!
Walleye Express Posted December 9, 2009 Author Posted December 9, 2009 The 1856 treaty that opened the door to Indian Gill netting in the other Great Lakes does not extend into Saginaw Bay, Thank God. But there are plenty enough other private citizen holding netting licenses to devastate the walleye fishery before it even reaches its peak. We need voices so plentiful and loud that even millionaires hear them loud and clear..
A-Fishy-Anado Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 DanIs Serafin a tribal fisherman? There are some posts on the U.P website about this and was curious.
Priority1 Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 DanIs Serafin a tribal fisherman? There are some posts on the U.P website about this and was curious.Serafin is NOT a tribal fisherman.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now